Expressions of Absurdity: Marxism in the works of Smith

Helmut P. Werther

Department of Literature, Miskatonic University, Arkham, Mass.

Charles M. F. Tilton

Department of Semiotics, University of Illinois


1. Foucaultist power relations and dialectic sublimation

“Class is a legal fiction,” says Bataille. Therefore, in Stardust,
Gaiman affirms Marxism; in Neverwhere he reiterates structuralist
subcultural theory.

The characteristic theme of Dahmus’s[1] model of Marxism
is the futility, and eventually the economy, of postconceptualist sexual
identity. Marx’s essay on the textual paradigm of consensus suggests that
reality is created by the collective unconscious. It could be said that Sartre
suggests the use of structuralist subcultural theory to analyse and read truth.

The premise of dialectic sublimation states that class, paradoxically, has
intrinsic meaning, given that culture is interchangeable with art. However, if
neosemioticist structural theory holds, we have to choose between structuralist
subcultural theory and precapitalist theory.

The primary theme of the works of Stone is not, in fact, appropriation, but
subappropriation. In a sense, Marx uses the term ‘dialectic sublimation’ to
denote the difference between language and sexual identity.

Brophy[2] implies that the works of Stone are empowering.
However, if the cultural paradigm of consensus holds, we have to choose between
dialectic sublimation and Marxist capitalism.

Derrida promotes the use of structuralist subcultural theory to challenge
hierarchy. Thus, the characteristic theme of Humphrey’s[3]
critique of postcapitalist nihilism is not discourse per se, but subdiscourse.

2. Discourses of rubicon

In the works of Stone, a predominant concept is the concept of dialectic
narrativity. The creation/destruction distinction intrinsic to Stone’s
Natural Born Killers is also evident in Platoon. But Foucault’s
essay on structuralist subcultural theory holds that consciousness is
intrinsically impossible.

The primary theme of the works of Stone is the role of the artist as writer.
Bataille uses the term ‘Marxism’ to denote the futility, and some would say the
dialectic, of postmodernist art. Thus, in JFK, Stone examines
structuralist subcultural theory; in Platoon, although, he denies
dialectic sublimation.

Lyotard suggests the use of structuralist subcultural theory to deconstruct
sexual identity. It could be said that Sargeant[4] states
that the works of Stone are postmodern.

If Marxism holds, we have to choose between cultural neoconstructive theory
and Sartreist existentialism. Therefore, the premise of dialectic sublimation
holds that narrative is a product of communication, but only if Derrida’s
critique of textual postcapitalist theory is valid; otherwise, we can assume
that language serves to marginalize the proletariat.

The subject is contextualised into a dialectic sublimation that includes
sexuality as a reality. But textual capitalism states that government is
elitist, given that consciousness is distinct from truth.

Humphrey[5] holds that we have to choose between Marxism
and textual theory. Therefore, Lyotard promotes the use of structuralist
subcultural theory to challenge capitalism.

3. Marxism and postsemiotic desituationism

In the works of Rushdie, a predominant concept is the distinction between
opening and closing. In The Ground Beneath Her Feet, Rushdie affirms
textual subconceptual theory; in Satanic Verses, however, he reiterates
postsemiotic desituationism. Thus, the characteristic theme of Drucker’s[6] essay on structuralist subcultural theory is a neocultural
totality.

“Truth is part of the futility of narrativity,” says Debord; however,
according to Geoffrey[7] , it is not so much truth that is
part of the futility of narrativity, but rather the rubicon, and subsequent
defining characteristic, of truth. The subject is interpolated into a dialectic
narrative that includes culture as a whole. Therefore, Baudrillard uses the
term ‘structuralist subcultural theory’ to denote the fatal flaw, and hence the
defining characteristic, of subtextual class.

If one examines postsemiotic desituationism, one is faced with a choice:
either reject structuralist subcultural theory or conclude that art has
significance. The example of Marxism prevalent in Rushdie’s The Ground
Beneath Her Feet
emerges again in Midnight’s Children, although in a
more mythopoetical sense. But the main theme of the works of Rushdie is not
theory, but pretheory.

“Sexual identity is dead,” says Lacan. Baudrillard suggests the use of
postsemiotic desituationism to modify and analyse reality. Thus, Sontag uses
the term ‘structuralist subcultural theory’ to denote the genre, and some would
say the collapse, of patriarchialist class.

If one examines Marxism, one is faced with a choice: either accept
structuralist subcultural theory or conclude that the purpose of the poet is
social comment, but only if Sartre’s analysis of postsemiotic desituationism is
invalid; if that is not the case, art is capable of intentionality. The primary
theme of la Tournier’s[8] critique of Marxism is the role of
the writer as artist. But if structuralist subcultural theory holds, the works
of Rushdie are an example of self-justifying Marxism.

“Sexual identity is fundamentally meaningless,” says Bataille. Derrida
promotes the use of Marxism to deconstruct hierarchy. It could be said that
Debord uses the term ‘structuralist subcultural theory’ to denote the common
ground between society and class.

“Society is part of the collapse of consciousness,” says Baudrillard;
however, according to Scuglia[9] , it is not so much society
that is part of the collapse of consciousness, but rather the absurdity, and
eventually the fatal flaw, of society. Many discourses concerning neotextual
capitalism may be found. In a sense, la Fournier[10]
implies that we have to choose between postsemiotic desituationism and
subsemantic desublimation.

Baudrillard uses the term ‘structuralist subcultural theory’ to denote a
materialist reality. But Marxism suggests that sexual identity, somewhat
surprisingly, has objective value, given that language is equal to truth.

Lyotard suggests the use of structuralist subcultural theory to read
sexuality. However, Marx’s essay on postcapitalist dialectic theory holds that
truth may be used to reinforce the status quo.

The main theme of the works of Rushdie is the role of the reader as writer.
Thus, Marxism states that the State is used in the service of hierarchy, but
only if Foucault’s critique of subconstructivist discourse is valid; otherwise,
we can assume that class has significance.

Several situationisms concerning the difference between consciousness and
sexual identity exist. It could be said that if structuralist subcultural
theory holds, we have to choose between the cultural paradigm of narrative and
neomaterialist feminism.

Postsemiotic desituationism suggests that sexuality serves to disempower the
Other. But Baudrillard uses the term ‘Marxism’ to denote not desublimation, as
Sontag would have it, but subdesublimation.

The subject is contextualised into a postsemiotic desituationism that
includes consciousness as a totality. It could be said that Lacan uses the term
‘Marxism’ to denote the role of the observer as artist.

The subject is interpolated into a structuralist subcultural theory that
includes reality as a reality. But Derrida uses the term ‘Marxism’ to denote
the bridge between class and sexual identity.

Any number of discourses concerning structuralist subcultural theory may be
discovered. It could be said that Sontag promotes the use of Marxism to
challenge class divisions.

The dialectic of postsemiotic desituationism intrinsic to Rushdie’s The
Ground Beneath Her Feet
is also evident in Satanic Verses. But the
characteristic theme of McElwaine’s[11] essay on the
dialectic paradigm of consensus is a self-supporting paradox.

4. Expressions of paradigm

“Class is intrinsically impossible,” says Bataille. An abundance of theories
concerning the difference between sexual identity and class exist. However, von
Junz[12] holds that we have to choose between structuralist
subcultural theory and structural subcapitalist theory.

“Culture is part of the futility of art,” says Baudrillard; however,
according to McElwaine[13] , it is not so much culture that
is part of the futility of art, but rather the dialectic, and thus the
paradigm, of culture. The subject is contextualised into a dialectic paradigm
of discourse that includes language as a reality. Thus, Foucault suggests the
use of postsemiotic desituationism to deconstruct and read sexual identity.

Many discourses concerning structuralist subcultural theory may be found.
But the subject is interpolated into a postsemiotic desituationism that
includes narrativity as a totality.

If Marxism holds, we have to choose between structuralist subcultural theory
and precapitalist semantic theory. However, la Fournier[14]
suggests that the works of Burroughs are not postmodern.

Lyotard’s model of Marxism implies that the task of the participant is
significant form. But the subject is contextualised into a material neocultural
theory that includes culture as a paradox.

Marx promotes the use of postsemiotic desituationism to challenge the status
quo. Therefore, Batailleist `powerful communication’ states that reality,
ironically, has objective value, but only if consciousness is distinct from
narrativity.


1. Dahmus, U. F. O. (1977)
Structuralist subcultural theory in the works of Stone. University of
Georgia Press

2. Brophy, Y. ed. (1980) Forgetting Lacan: Marxism and
structuralist subcultural theory.
And/Or Press

3. Humphrey, U. Q. (1993) Marxism in the works of
McLaren.
University of Southern North Dakota at Hoople Press

4. Sargeant, L. M. V. ed. (1974) The Stone Sea:
Structuralist subcultural theory in the works of Rushdie.
Panic Button
Books

5. Humphrey, U. J. (1985) Structuralist subcultural theory
and Marxism.
And/Or Press

6. Drucker, L. B. Z. ed. (1992) Deconstructing Marx:
Marxism, textual feminism and nationalism.
Panic Button Books

7. Geoffrey, M. (1970) Marxism in the works of Smith.
Loompanics

8. la Tournier, I. F. R. ed. (1994) The Genre of Reality:
The posttextual paradigm of discourse, nationalism and Marxism.
University
of North Carolina Press

9. Scuglia, W. M. (1985) Marxism and structuralist
subcultural theory.
University of Massachusetts Press

10. la Fournier, W. ed. (1999) Cultural Constructions:
Marxism, Batailleist `powerful communication’ and nationalism.
Panic Button
Books

11. McElwaine, P. Z. A. (1975) Marxism in the works of
Gibson.
Loompanics

12. von Junz, T. S. ed. (1981) Forgetting Sontag:
Structuralist subcultural theory and Marxism.
And/Or Press

13. McElwaine, V. (1996) Marxism in the works of
Burroughs.
Panic Button Books

14. la Fournier, A. C. ed. (1972) Reassessing Social
realism: Nationalism, postdialectic situationism and Marxism.
O’Reilly &
Associates


The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this link.
If you liked this particular essay and would like to return to it, follow this link for a bookmarkable page.

The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the Dada Engine, a system for generating random text from recursive grammars, and modified very slightly by Josh Larios (this version, anyway. There are others out there).

This installation of the Generator has delivered 41,411,705 essays since 25/Feb/2000 18:43:09 PST, when it became operational.

More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University Department of Computer Science Technical Report 96/264: On the Simulation of Postmodernism and Mental Debility Using Recursive Transition Networks.

More generated texts are linked to from the sidebar to the right.

If you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the Social Text Affair, where NYU Physics Professor Alan Sokal’s brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax article was accepted by a cultural criticism publication.

dada engine